- Many wealthy nations refrain from building nuclear weapons not because they lack the capability, but because they are bound by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), rely on the U.S. nuclear umbrella
for deterrence, and fear the economic and diplomatic costs of sanctions, while North Korea, one of the poorest countries in the world, has made nuclear arms the centerpiece of its survival strategy. In 2001,
Pyongyang spent more than $5 billion on defense—over 30% of GDP, and by 2024 military expenditure still consumed 15.9% of government spending, about USD 1.47 billion, even as famine left 84% of households
with borderline or poor food consumption, one‑third of children stunted, and infant mortality at 33%. After withdrawing from the NPT in 2003, the regime relied on clandestine networks to acquire technology,
then forced domestic scientists into nuclear research under the Songun or "military‑first" policy. By mid‑2024, analysts estimated North Korea had produced enough fissile material for up to 90 warheads, with
roughly 50 assembled, and in 2025 the parliament declared nuclear weapons status "permanently fixed in law." This stark contrast shows how rich nations choose restraint for stability, while North Korea
embraces nuclear weapons as a desperate lifeline, sacrificing prosperity for authoritarian survival and global leverage.
- North Korea has been able to sustain a nuclear program despite isolation and poverty by coercively channeling its limited talent into military research, tightly controlling education, and diverting scarce
resources into weapons development. Promising students are funneled into elite institutions such as Kim Il-sung University and Kim Chaek University of Technology, where they are trained in physics, engineering,
and chemistry before being conscripted into nuclear projects, often described as “slaves to the bomb.” Although cut off from global scientific collaboration, the regime has relied on clandestine networks and
illicit technology transfers, particularly after withdrawing from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 2003, to acquire critical knowledge and equipment. Once secured, domestic scientists adapted and
maintained these systems under strict state oversight. The scale of investment is striking: in 2001, military spending exceeded $5 billion—over 30% of GDP, and by 2024 defense still consumed 15.9% of
government expenditure, about USD 1.47 billion. Analysts estimated that by mid‑2024 Pyongyang had produced enough fissile material for up to 90 nuclear warheads, with roughly 50 assembled, and in 2025
the parliament declared nuclear weapons status “permanently fixed in law.” This trajectory underscores the paradox of a nation where 84% of households survive on borderline or poor food consumption,
one‑third of children are stunted, and infant mortality reaches 33%, yet its most educated citizens are conscripted into nuclear research to cement authoritarian control and global leverage.
- North Korea has managed to build nuclear weapons despite being one of the world’s poorest states by relentlessly prioritizing military power over civilian welfare. In 2001, military spending exceeded $5 billion,
more than 30% of GDP, while in 2024 defense still consumed 15.9% of government expenditure—around USD 1.47 billion. Guided by the Songun or “military‑first” policy, the regime diverted scarce resources into weapons
programs, acquiring technology through clandestine networks and investing heavily in uranium enrichment and plutonium reprocessing. By mid‑2024, analysts estimated Pyongyang had produced enough fissile material for
up to 90 nuclear warheads, with roughly 50 assembled, and in 2025 the parliament reaffirmed a defense‑heavy budget while declaring nuclear weapons status “permanently fixed in law.” This trajectory reveals a stark
paradox: while 84% of households survive on borderline or poor food consumption, one‑third of children are stunted, and infant mortality reaches 33%, billions continue to be funneled into missiles and warheads,
cementing authoritarian control and global leverage at the expense of mass deprivation.
- North Korea has continued to channel vast resources into its military despite economic collapse, with defense consuming 15.9% of government expenditure in 2024—around USD 1.47 billion—even as citizens
endured worsening shortages of food and medicine. This obsession with military strength is not new; in 2001, spending exceeded $5 billion, more than 30% of GDP, one of the highest ratios in the world. Guided
by the Songun or “military-first” policy, weapons programs remained the regime’s top priority, and by mid‑2024 analysts estimated Pyongyang had produced enough fissile material for up to 90 nuclear warheads,
with roughly 50 assembled. In 2025, the parliament reaffirmed a defense‑heavy budget, and the government declared its nuclear weapons status “permanently fixed in law,” cementing its role as a nuclear power.
This trajectory exposes a stark paradox: while 84% of households survive on borderline or poor food consumption, one‑third of children are stunted, and infant mortality reaches 33%, billions continue to be
funneled into missiles and warheads to sustain authoritarian control and global leverage.
- The satire film The Interview captures surprising truths about North Korea, particularly its psychological landscape and the regime’s obsession with appearances. Experts have noted that the film’s depiction of fake
abundance—like supermarkets filled with plastic produce—is not far from reality. During the famine years, visitors to Pyongyang reported seeing exactly that: shelves stocked with artificial fruits and vegetables designed
to project prosperity while citizens starved outside. This surreal façade reflects the regime’s strategy of masking deprivation with propaganda, creating a Potemkin‑style illusion of normalcy that mirrors the absurdity
portrayed in the movie.
- In North Korea, attempting to leave the country without official permission is treated as a serious crime, with the regime threatening detention and forced labor as punishment for disobedience. Many families risk
escape by crossing into China in hopes of finding refuge overseas, but those captured are often sent to political prisoner camps notorious for systemic abuse. Conditions inside these camps are harsh, with reports of
forced labor, torture, and extremely high death rates. U.S. and South Korean officials estimate that between 80,000 and 120,000 people are currently imprisoned in such facilities, making them one of the most extensive
systems of political incarceration in the world.
- North Korea’s poverty is compounded by authoritarian control, sanctions, and prioritization of military spending, which limit consumer welfare and economic development. North Korea is among the world’s
poorest countries, with GDP per capita far below global averages and comparable to struggling nations such as Yemen, Myanmar, and Nepal.
- Nepal ($1,540–1,560) edges above both, though it remains one of Asia’s poorest economies.
- Myanmar ($1,359) is slightly higher than North Korea but faces severe instability after the 2021 coup.
- North Korea’s GDP per capita ($1,319) places it in the bottom tier globally, just above Yemen but below Nepal and Myanmar.
- Yemen ($634) is poorer due to ongoing civil war and economic fragmentation.
- North Korea ranks among the poorest nations in the world, with up to 60% of its population living below the poverty line as of 2020, monthly wages often hovering around $2–$3, and chronic food
shortages that demand about 5.3 million tonnes of grain annually while producing only 4.5 million tonnes. The collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s triggered a famine that killed hundreds of thousands,
exposing the contradiction between Juche’s promise of self-reliance and the regime’s reliance on foreign aid. Even in the 2020s, reports of starvation persist, underscoring the humanitarian crisis. Despite this
extreme poverty, the state has endured by prioritizing military spending, conducting its first nuclear test in 2006, and leveraging alliances with China and Russia, which helped GDP rebound by 3.1% in 2023 after
years of contraction. This paradox of destitution paired with survival highlights how authoritarian control, dynastic legitimacy, and opportunistic partnerships have allowed one of the world’s most isolated regimes
to persist against the odds.
- In North Korea, poverty is entrenched, with estimates suggesting that between 40% and 60% of the population—roughly 24 million people—live below the poverty line, while most workers earn only $2 to $3 per month.
Daily life has deteriorated into extreme deprivation, defined by chronic food shortages and limited access to basic services. Since the early 1980s, average life expectancy has dropped by five years, reflecting
the heavy toll of isolation, international sanctions, and the regime’s relentless prioritization of military spending over social welfare. This paradox of survival amid destitution underscores how authoritarian
control, dynastic rule, and ideological rigidity have enabled one of the world’s most impoverished states to endure despite decades of economic decline.
- North Korea’s COVID‑19 crisis was defined by secrecy, repression, and economic collapse, with the regime acknowledging its first outbreak only on May 8, 2022 in Pyongyang and later claiming just 168 confirmed
cases and 74 deaths, figures widely doubted given the lack of testing and fragile healthcare system. Borders were sealed almost completely, cutting off trade with China and worsening food shortages, while suspected
cases were sometimes sent to harsh quarantine camps and lockdown rules enforced through arbitrary detention. By 2024–2025, escapees described pandemic restrictions as tools of control that shrank freedoms even further,
with movement, employment, and food access tightly restricted. The humanitarian toll was immense: markets disrupted, aid blocked, vaccines absent, and repression deepened, leaving ordinary citizens to endure hunger
and instability while state media portrayed the leadership as victorious against the virus. The paradox is stark—North Korea claimed triumph over COVID‑19, yet by 2025 the country still suffers the aftershocks of
isolation, famine, and systemic neglect.
- North Korea suffers from a widespread methamphetamine epidemic that took root in the early 2000s, when state‑run factories began producing meth as a way to offset the collapsing economy and generate revenue.
What began as an export commodity quickly spread domestically, turning meth into a common fixture of daily life and even a perceived luxury item in a society with few other comforts. The result has been devastating:
reports estimate that as many as 80% of residents have used meth at least once, while around 40% are addicted, creating one of the highest rates of drug dependency in the world. With little to no government support
for treatment and a regime that has historically tolerated or even encouraged production as an economic stimulus, meth has become both a coping mechanism for poverty and a symbol of systemic neglect, deepening the
humanitarian crisis already marked by famine, corruption, and repression.
- In North Korea, healthcare is officially declared free under the state system, yet in practice residents are often denied treatment unless they can afford the high prices of medicine on the black market or
through informal channels. Hospitals frequently lack basic supplies, electricity, and trained staff, leaving patients to provide their own drugs, bandages, or even food during hospitalization. This contradiction
between the promise of universal care and the reality of exclusion underscores the broader crisis of deprivation, where poverty, sanctions, and mismanagement have eroded access to essential services. The result
is a system where survival depends less on state guarantees and more on personal resources, deepening inequality in one of the world’s most isolated nations.
- In North Korea, the end of fertilizer imports from South Korea in 2008 forced the regime to adopt an extraordinary and controversial solution: a nationwide program requiring farmers to use human feces as
fertilizer. To sustain agricultural output, the government imposed quotas on citizens, with factory workers reportedly ordered to provide up to two tons of human waste each. This policy reflected both the desperation
of a state struggling with chronic food shortages and the rigid enforcement of self-reliance under Juche ideology. While intended to boost crop yields, the program underscored the extent of deprivation, as the
population was compelled to meet impossible quotas with little regard for health or dignity.
- Timeline of Food Crisis Responses in North Korea:
- 1990s: Famine and Foraging
- Collapse of the Soviet Union triggered famine that killed hundreds of thousands.
- Citizens survived on tree bark, roots, and wild plants.
- Informal barter markets (jangmadang) emerged as lifelines outside state control.
- 2000s: Two Meals a Day Campaign
- Government urged citizens to eat only twice daily to conserve food.
- Policy deepened hunger and sparked frequent food riots.
- 2007: Giant Rabbit Experiment
- Kim Jong-il imported oversized rabbits from German breeder Karl Szmolinsky to boost meat supply.
- Project collapsed when the rabbits were reportedly eaten instead of bred.
- 2000s–2010s: Rooftop Farming and Substitute Foods
- Urban rooftops converted into vegetable plots.
- Corn and grass promoted as patriotic substitutes for rice.
- 2010s–2020s: Persistent Shortages
- UN FAO study found 84% of households had “borderline or poor food consumption.”
- World Food Programme reported one-third of children stunted and infant mortality at 33%.
- Food assistance declined sharply after 2009, worsening deprivation.
- In North Korea, poverty and food shortages remain pervasive, with the famine that began in the 1990s leaving a lasting scar and forcing the country to depend heavily on international aid to feed its people.
Since 2009, however, food assistance has declined sharply, worsening the crisis. A United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization study revealed that 84% of households survive on “borderline or poor food consumption,”
while the World Food Programme reports that one-third of children are stunted by malnutrition and the infant mortality rate stands at 33%. The government’s “two meals a day campaign” has further fueled unrest, with
food riots becoming a common occurrence. These conditions, compounded by isolation and sanctions, have resulted in thousands of deaths and entrenched extreme deprivation across the population.
- In North Korea, in 2007, Kim Jong-il reportedly sought to address food shortages by importing giant rabbits bred by Karl Szmolinsky, a German rabbit breeder known for producing some of the world’s largest rabbits.
The plan was to use these oversized animals as a source of meat to help alleviate famine conditions. Szmolinsky sent several of his rabbits to North Korea, but the experiment quickly collapsed. Reports suggested that
instead of establishing a breeding program, the rabbits were eaten—possibly even by Kim Jong-il himself—ending the initiative before it could make any impact. This story highlights the regime’s often desperate and
unconventional attempts to tackle chronic food insecurity, which has persisted since the 1990s famine. It also underscores the paradox of Juche’s emphasis on self-reliance, as even bizarre foreign imports were
considered a potential solution to hunger.
- In North Korea, survival has often depended on bizarre and desperate food policies, from the Two Meals a Day campaign in the 2000s, which urged citizens to eat only twice daily and sparked frequent food riots,
to Kim Jong-il’s 2007 rabbit-breeding experiment, inspired by German breeder Karl Szmolinsky, that collapsed when the giant rabbits were reportedly eaten instead of bred. Urban rooftops were transformed into vegetable
plots, corn and even grass were promoted as patriotic substitutes for rice, and during the 1990s famine thousands relied on tree bark, roots, and wild plants to stay alive. Informal barter markets known as jangmadang
also emerged, becoming critical lifelines outside state control. These unusual strategies, blending propaganda with improvisation, reveal the paradox of Juche’s self-reliance: while the regime insists on ideological
independence, survival has often hinged on improvised farming, substitute foods, and grassroots markets that expose the fragility of one of the world’s most isolated economies.
- Since the 1950s, North Korea has survived isolation by continually reshaping its strategies, beginning with Kim Il-sung’s revolutionary push for independence, formalizing Juche in the 1972 constitution, and
immortalizing it with the towering monument built in 1982. The collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s unleashed a catastrophic famine that claimed hundreds of thousands of lives, forcing reliance on foreign
aid despite Juche’s doctrine of self-reliance. In response, Kim Jong-il advanced Songun (“military-first”), while the regime’s inaugural nuclear test in 2006 ushered in a new era of deterrence. Under Kim Jong-un,
Juche has been reinterpreted in the 2010s–2020s as a justification for nuclear development and sovereignty, even as the state cautiously engages with the outside world through high-profile summits in 2018–2019 and
renewed alliances with China and Russia.
- Over more than 70 years, North Korea has managed to survive isolation through a mix of authoritarian control, dynastic legitimacy, military deterrence, and selective foreign alliances. The Kim family’s rule—spanning
three generations—has been cemented by Juche ideology, which stresses self-reliance yet paradoxically collided with reliance on foreign aid during the devastating famines of the 1990s. Kim Il-sung’s revolutionary
independence of the 1950s evolved into Kim Jong-il’s formalized doctrine and military-first expansion in the 1970s–1990s, before Kim Jong-un reframed Juche in the 2010s–2020s as justification for nuclear development.
Despite closed borders and economic hardship, the regime has adapted by leveraging ties with China and Russia, securing lifelines that allowed GDP to grow by 3.1% in 2023 after years of contraction. This blend of
ideological rigidity, militarization, and opportunistic alliances has enabled one of the world’s most isolated states to endure, with Juche acting as the ideological glue binding the Kim dynasty’s survival strategy.
- In North Korea, the ideology of Juche has transformed over more than 70 years, beginning with Kim Il-sung’s revolutionary call for independence in the 1950s, evolving into Kim Jong-il’s formalized doctrine of self-reliance
and military-first expansion during the 1970s–1990s, and culminating in Kim Jong-un’s use of Juche as a justification for nuclear development in the 2010s–2020s. This trajectory is marked by a striking paradox: Juche’s
insistence on self-sufficiency often collided with the regime’s reliance on foreign aid, most visibly during the catastrophic famines of the 1990s. Yet, despite these contradictions, Juche has endured as the ideological
cement of the Kim dynasty, reshaping itself to meet shifting political and economic challenges while sustaining dynastic legitimacy and the cult of personality that defines the regime.
- North Korea’s political system is a dynastic, authoritarian regime that has been ruled by the Kim family for three generations, beginning with Kim Il-sung, followed by Kim Jong-il, and now Kim Jong-un, who holds absolute
power as head of state, commander of the military, and leader of the Workers’ Party of Korea. The system is defined by its centralized structure, where decision-making flows entirely from the top, and by its unique ideology
of Juche, introduced in the 1950s, which emphasizes self-reliance in politics, economics, and defense. Juche has been adapted across decades to justify policies ranging from economic isolation to nuclear development, while
the military-first doctrine, Songun, further entrenches the priority of armed strength. A powerful cult of personality surrounds the Kim lineage, with Kim Il-sung enshrined as the “eternal president,” Kim Jong-il revered as
his successor, and Kim Jong-un portrayed as the guardian of national survival. Together, these elements create a system that fuses dynastic succession, ideological rigidity, and militarization into one of the most centralized
and enduring authoritarian regimes in the world.
- In 2011, Transparency International ranked North Korea as the world’s most corrupt country, a label that reflects the regime’s dependence on illicit wealth to sustain itself. Kim Jong‑un is believed to have inherited
$4 billion from his father, with South Korean reports placing his fortune as high as $5 billion, and in 2025 his fortune is still estimated at $4–5 billion, hidden in secret foreign accounts and built on counterfeiting,
narcotics sales, arms trading, and other illegal ventures. Despite UN bans on luxury imports since 2006, reports show that in 2024 North Korea imported $51.92 million worth of luxury goods—from cosmetics and watches to
alcohol—used for “gift politics” to reward loyal elites, while a South Korean study estimated Kim spends up to $1.82 billion annually on perks for insiders, including luxury cars, designer items, and lavish events.
This extravagance mirrors earlier excesses, such as the $645.8 million spent on luxury goods in 2012, and stands in stark contrast to the country’s humanitarian crisis, where 84% of households survive on borderline or
poor food consumption, one‑third of children are stunted, and infant mortality reaches 33%. The paradox is stark: a nation branded the most corrupt in 2011 continues to funnel billions into indulgence and elite rewards
while its people endure chronic deprivation.
- The relationship between the U.S. and China is complex, shaped by decades of history, economic competition, and geopolitical tensions. It's a relationship full of cooperation and conflict, shaped by shifting global
priorities and national interests. While they are deeply interconnected economically, their strategic and ideological differences often fuel tensions. The competition for technological dominance, military presence
in the Pacific, and issues like human rights and trade policies continue to be major points of contention. Tariffs, trade agreements, and economic policies influence everything from global markets to diplomatic
tensions. Beyond tariffs, trade policies also shape economic strategies. China is shifting toward a consumer-driven economy, but U.S. trade pressures make that transition difficult. Recent trade policies play
a huge role in shaping U.S.-China relations, often acting as both a bridge and a battleground. Despite these challenges, both countries recognize the importance of maintaining dialogue to avoid escalation and
find areas of mutual benefit.
- Corruption-related human rights abuses occur worldwide, affecting governance, justice, and individual freedoms. Corruption diverts public funds, crippling essential services like healthcare, education, and housing.
It disproportionately affects marginalized groups, exacerbating poverty and inequality. For example,
- North Korea: The government engages in severe repression, including arbitrary detentions, forced labor camps, and public executions; political prisoners face torture and starvation, and corruption within the ruling elite ensures impunity
for officials; defectors report forced labor, arbitrary detentions, and public executions; corruption within the ruling elite ensures impunity for officials, while ordinary citizens suffer severe repression.
- Uganda: Activists like Aloikin Praise Opoloje have been recognized for their fight against corruption and human rights violations; she has faced arrests and imprisonment for advocating civil liberties and accountability.
- South Sudan: Corruption has fueled violent conflicts, leading to mass killings, displacement, and human rights violations; government officials have been accused of embezzling public funds, worsening poverty and instability.
- Saudi Arabia: Political prisoners face harsh treatment, including torture and prolonged detention without trial; corruption within the judicial system allows wealthy and powerful individuals to evade justice, while activists and
journalists are silenced.
- Malaysia: The 1MDB scandal involved billions of dollars in embezzled funds, affecting public services and economic stability; corruption in law enforcement has led to wrongful arrests and suppression of dissent.
- Russia: Corruption is deeply entrenched in government institutions, leading to politically motivated arrests, suppression of opposition, and media censorship; corruption in law enforcement has led to politically motivated arrests,
suppression of opposition, and media censorship; activists and journalists who expose corruption face intimidation and violence.
- People often believe that Saudi Arabia has led to serious human rights abuses, affecting freedom of expression, political participation, and access to justice. For example,
- Suppression of Free Speech: Authorities censor media, restrict internet freedom, and criminalize dissent, making it difficult for citizens to express political opinions or criticize the government.
- Arbitrary Detentions & Political Prisoners: The government has detained activists, journalists, and dissidents following unfair trials on vague charges that violate their rights to free expression and association.
- Harsh Prison Conditions: Reports indicate that detainees face life-threatening conditions, including solitary confinement, inadequate healthcare, and physical abuse.
- Executions & Death Penalty: Saudi Arabia has carried out mass executions, including the execution of 196 people in 2022, making it one of the highest-ranking countries for capital punishment.
- Migrant Worker Exploitation: Migrant workers face widespread abuses, including poor working conditions, wage theft, and restrictions on movement.
- Transnational Repression: The Saudi government has been accused of harassing dissidents abroad, using intimidation tactics against their families as a form of collective punishment.
- Human Rights Concerns in FIFA World Cup Hosting: Saudi Arabia’s 2034 FIFA World Cup bid has raised concerns about human rights violations, including restrictions on freedom of expression, arbitrary arrests, and mistreatment of migrant workers.
- People often believe that China has faced significant criticism for human rights abuses, particularly regarding freedom of expression, political participation, and access to justice. For example,
- Mass Surveillance & Arbitrary Detentions: The government has deployed invasive mass surveillance technology to monitor citizens, particularly in Xinjiang and Tibet; authorities have arbitrarily detained human rights defenders, journalists,
and ethnic minorities.
- Suppression of Free Speech: The government imposes strict censorship, blocking access to foreign news and social media platforms; journalists and activists who criticize the government face harassment, imprisonment, or forced disappearances.
- Political Repression: The National Security Law in Hong Kong has led to the systematic dismantling of freedoms of expression, association, and assembly; activists and opposition figures have been arrested or forced into exile.
- Forced Labor & Detention Camps: Reports indicate that over one million Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities have been detained in extrajudicial internment camps, facing forced labor, torture, and indoctrination.
- Transnational Repression: The Chinese government has been accused of harassing dissidents abroad, using intimidation tactics against their families in China as a form of collective punishment.
- Singapore has a mixed reputation when it comes to freedom of expression, political participation, and access to justice. While it is known for its efficient governance and economic success, concerns remain about restrictions on civil liberties.
- Freedom of Expression: Singapore has strict laws regulating speech, including the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA), which allows authorities to censor online content; critics argue that these laws are used to silence
dissent and independent media.
- Political Participation: The ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) has dominated politics since 1959, and opposition parties face structural challenges in gaining influence; elections are generally free of irregularities, but legal and
electoral frameworks limit political competition.
- Access to Justice: Singapore’s judicial system is known for its efficiency and low corruption, but concerns exist about detention without trial and harsh punishments, including mandatory caning and the death penalty for drug-related offenses.
- Singapore has strict media regulations, which have led to concerns about press freedom and editorial independence. According to the 2025 World Press Freedom Index, Singapore ranks 123rd out of 180 countries, reflecting limited media freedom
and government control, for example,
- Government Control: The ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) appoints board members and editors of major media outlets, ensuring alignment with government policies.
- Censorship & Fake News Laws: The Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) allows authorities to correct or remove online content they deem false, raising concerns about censorship and suppression of dissent.
- Limited Independent Media: Independent news platforms face harassment and restrictions, with some outlets, like The Online Citizen, having their broadcasting licenses revoked.
- Foreign Media Restrictions: The government has the power to approve or block foreign media publications, limiting access to international perspectives.
- Self-Censorship: Journalists and media organizations often avoid politically sensitive topics, fearing legal consequences or financial pressure.
- Singapore's judicial independence is protected by its constitution, statutes, and common law. The judiciary is expected to remain separate from legislative and executive power, ensuring fair legal proceedings and shielding judges from
inappropriate pressure. Singapore’s judiciary is highly efficient and has a strong reputation for low corruption; however, human rights organizations have criticized harsh punishments and legal restrictions on civil liberties, and
journalists and media organizations often avoid politically sensitive topics, fearing legal consequences or financial pressure.
- Government Control: The ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) appoints board members and editors of major media outlets, ensuring alignment with government policies.
- Courts generally uphold the rule of law, but concerns exist regarding cases involving political opponents or activists.
- Detention without trial is permitted under laws like the Internal Security Act (ISA), used historically to detain political dissidents.
- Mandatory sentencing applies to drug offenses, including the death penalty and caning for certain crimes.
- Censorship & Fake News Laws: The Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) allows authorities to correct or remove online content they deem false, raising concerns about censorship and suppression of dissent.
- Limited Independent Media: Independent news platforms face harassment and restrictions, with some outlets, like The Online Citizen, having their broadcasting licenses revoked.
- Foreign Media Restrictions: The government has the power to approve or block foreign media publications, limiting access to international perspectives.
- Since 2008, Thailand’s Constitutional Court has become a powerful arbiter of political fate, ousting six prime ministers, all of them connected to former premier Thaksin Shinawatra and his political network. Every prime minister
brought before the court—except Prayuth Chan-ocha, the general who seized power in the 2014 coup—has been removed, underscoring the judiciary’s decisive role in shaping political outcomes. These removals highlight the enduring struggle
between elected governments aligned with Thaksin’s populist base and entrenched institutions such as the military, monarchy, and judiciary, which have repeatedly intervened to limit his influence. The pattern illustrates how Thailand’s
political volatility is not only driven by coups but also by judicial intervention, with the courts acting as a recurring mechanism to dismantle governments tied to Thaksin’s legacy.
- 2008 – Samak Sundaravej: Removed after the Constitutional Court ruled he violated conflict-of-interest laws by hosting a cooking TV show while in office.
- 2008 – Somchai Wongsawat: Ousted when the court dissolved the ruling People’s Power Party for electoral fraud; Somchai was Thaksin’s brother-in-law.
- 2014 – Yingluck Shinawatra: Removed for abuse of power related to the transfer of a senior security official; she was Thaksin’s sister.
- 2008–2014 – Other leaders tied to Thaksin’s network Several party dissolutions and rulings targeted pro-Thaksin governments, culminating in repeated removals.
- 2014 onward – Prayuth Chan-ocha Unlike his predecessors, Prayuth, a general who staged the 2014 coup, was never removed by the Constitutional Court.
- 2025 - Thaksin Shinawatra’s daughter, Paetongtarn Shinawatra, briefly became Thailand’s youngest prime minister at age 39, but her tenure ended abruptly when the Constitutional Court suspended and then removed her from office
over alleged ethical violations tied to a leaked phone call with former Cambodian leader Hun Sen.
- Thailand has faced significant challenges regarding freedom of expression, political participation, and access to justice. According to Freedom House, Thailand's status declined from "Partly Free" to "Not Free" due to political repression,
restrictions on free speech, and judicial interference.
- Freedom of Expression
- Authorities restrict press freedom, using lèse-majesté laws to prosecute critics of the monarchy.
- Journalists, activists, and opposition figures face arbitrary arrests and harassment for expressing dissent.
- The government censors online content, limiting access to independent news sources.
- Political Participation
- The Move Forward Party (MFP), a leading opposition group, was blocked from forming a government and later dissolved by the Constitutional Court.
- The military-appointed Senate has played a key role in preventing opposition parties from gaining power.
- Elections are competitive, but legal frameworks favor military-aligned parties.
- Access to Justice
- The judiciary has been criticized for political interference, with courts removing opposition leaders and blocking reforms.
- Human rights activists and protesters face harsh legal penalties, including long prison sentences.
- Due process is not guaranteed, and there is impunity for crimes committed against activists.
- Corruption remains a significant issue in Thailand, affecting government institutions, businesses, and law enforcement. For example,
- Construction Scandal: A major building collapse in Bangkok led to the arrest of Premchai Karnasuta, a construction tycoon, and 14 others; investigations revealed violations of safety standards, including substandard materials and
structural flaws.
- Temple Embezzlement: A Buddhist monk was arrested for allegedly embezzling $9 million from a temple’s donation funds; authorities linked the stolen money to an illegal online gambling network.
- Judicial Corruption: Thailand’s judiciary has been criticized for political interference, with courts removing opposition leaders and blocking reforms.
- Police Corruption: Corruption is widespread in Thailand’s police force, with reports of bribery, abuse of power, and political entanglement.
- Transparency Ranking: Thailand ranks 107th out of 180 countries on the Corruption Perceptions Index, scoring 34/100, indicating high levels of corruption.
- Thailand’s political landscape is defined by four recurring themes that reveal both its fragility and resilience. Military dominance has been the most consistent driver of regime change, with coups serving as the default
mechanism for resetting governments. Alongside this, judicial intervention has repeatedly shaped outcomes, as courts dissolve political parties or remove prime ministers, often tipping the balance of power during crises. The
monarchy’s role remains symbolic yet deeply influential, with the king frequently legitimizing coups and acting as a stabilizing figure in moments of upheaval. Despite these elite forces, public participation has proven
remarkably strong—elections consistently draw high voter turnout, reflecting enduring democratic aspirations even in the face of repeated interruptions. Together, these themes illustrate a cycle where authority is contested
between entrenched institutions and the people’s persistent demand for representation.
- Thailand’s constitutional journey since 1932 has been one of constant reinvention, with more than 20 constitutions introduced to recalibrate the delicate balance between monarchy, military, and elected representatives.
Each coup has typically been followed by a new charter, designed either to legitimize military dominance or to reset political institutions in the hope of stability. This cycle has created a political landscape where
constitutions serve less as enduring frameworks and more as instruments of power. The 2017 constitution, drafted under military oversight, remains the latest iteration, but it has drawn sharp criticism for embedding mechanisms
that extend military influence deep into the political system, ensuring that even democratic elections unfold under the shadow of entrenched elite control.
- Timeline of Coups and Constitutions in Thailand (1932–2014)
- 1932 – End of absolute monarchy through a bloodless coup; first constitution introduced.
- 1933 – Military coup against the first civilian government; constitution suspended and reinstated.
- 1939–1947 – Several rebellions and coups, including the 1947 coup, which installed military dominance.
- 1949–1951 – “Grand Palace Coup” (1949) and “Manhattan Coup” (1951), both reinforcing military power.
- 1957–1958 – Coups led by Field Marshal Sarit Thanarat, ushering in authoritarian rule.
- 1971 – Coup by Prime Minister Thanom Kittikachorn, dissolving parliament.
- 1973 – Student-led uprising forced Thanom’s resignation, briefly opening democratic space.
- 1976 – Coup following violent crackdown on student protests; military rule restored.
- 1977 – Another coup consolidating military control.
- 1981 – Attempted coup (“Young Turks”) failed, but highlighted military factionalism.
- 1985 – Coup attempt failed, but instability persisted.
- 1991 – Successful coup ousted civilian government, leading to military-backed administration.
- 2006 – Coup against Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra, citing corruption and abuse of power.
- 2014 – Coup led by General Prayuth Chan-ocha, dissolving government and suspending constitution.
- Thailand’s political history since the end of absolute monarchy in 1932 has been marked by extraordinary turbulence, with over a dozen military coups reshaping its governments and rewriting its constitutions more than 20 times.
Each coup has typically suspended or replaced the constitution, dissolved parliament, and installed military-backed administrations, reflecting the enduring influence of the armed forces in Thai politics. Despite this cycle of upheaval,
the framework of a constitutional monarchy has remained in place, with the monarch as head of state, the prime minister as head of government, and the judiciary formally independent.
- Thailand’s politics unfold within a unitary parliamentary constitutional monarchy established in 1932, when the nation shifted from absolute monarchy to constitutional rule, and since then more than 20 constitutions have been
drafted amid over a dozen military coups. The hereditary monarch, currently King Vajiralongkorn (Rama X), serves as head of state, while the prime minister leads the government and is formally appointed by the monarch after nomination
by the House of Representatives. The bicameral National Assembly consists of the elected House of Representatives and the partly appointed Senate, both of which shape legislation under the watchful eye of an independent judiciary,
with the Constitutional Court often playing a decisive role in dissolving parties or removing leaders. Despite regular elections with high voter turnout, the military, monarchy, and judiciary remain powerful forces, ensuring that
Thailand’s political story is one of vibrant public participation intertwined with recurring elite influence and dramatic institutional resets.
- India has a complex landscape when it comes to freedom of expression, political participation, and access to justice; while it is the largest democracy in the world, concerns have been raised about press freedom, judicial independence,
and political rights.
- Freedom of Expression
- India’s constitution guarantees free speech, but restrictions exist under laws like sedition and defamation statutes.
- Journalists and activists have faced arrests, harassment, and censorship, particularly when criticizing the government.
- Internet shutdowns have been used to control dissent, with India leading globally in the number of government-imposed blackouts.
- Media freedom has declined, with India ranking 161st out of 180 countries in the 2023 World Press Freedom Index.
- Political Participation
- India has a multiparty democracy, with elections generally considered free and fair; however, concerns exist about electoral manipulation, voter suppression, and the use of state resources for political advantage.
- Religious and ethnic minorities have reported discrimination and exclusion from political processes.
- Access to Justice
- India’s judicial system is independent, but delays, corruption, and political influence affect legal proceedings.
- Police misconduct and extrajudicial killings have been reported, particularly in cases involving minorities and political dissidents.
- Legal protections exist, but enforcement is inconsistent, leading to impunity for powerful individuals.
- Corruption remains a major issue in India, affecting government institutions, businesses, and public services. For example,
- Kiru Hydropower Corruption Case: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed a chargesheet against former Jammu and Kashmir governor Satya Pal Malik and five others for alleged irregularities in awarding civil contracts
worth ₹2,200 crore for the Kiru Hydro Electric Power Project.
- Rafale Fighter Jet Deal: The purchase of 36 Rafale jets from France became a political controversy, with allegations of favoritism, lack of transparency, and procedural irregularities under Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government.
- Jal Shakti Schemes: Concerns have been raised about irregularities in water supply projects, with reports of inflated contracts, incomplete work, and corruption in tendering processes.
- Transparency Ranking: India ranks 96th out of 180 countries on the Corruption Perceptions Index, scoring 38/100, indicating high levels of corruption.
- Land ownership in South Africa is deeply intertwined with colonialism and apartheid due to its 1913 Land Act that was a pivotal moment, legally restricting black South Africans from owning land in most areas,
reinforcing segregation and economic disparity; it has been a deeply contested issue, shaped by historical injustices and ongoing debates about equity and redistribution. As a result, as of today while
whites in South Africa account for some 7 percent of the population, they still own at least
72% of commercial farmland; it's not fair in this modern society.
- Apartheid had a complex impact on white South Africans. While they benefited from political and economic dominance, the system also shaped their society in lasting ways.
Despite these challenges, white South Africans remain a significant part of the country's economy and culture.
- Economic Privilege: White South Africans had access to better jobs, education, and infrastructure, leading to higher incomes and wealth accumulation.
- Political Control: They held exclusive voting rights and leadership positions, ensuring continued dominance in governance.
- Social Isolation: Apartheid policies created a segregated society, limiting interactions between racial groups and fostering divisions.
- International Backlash: Many white South Africans faced global condemnation, sanctions, and travel restrictions due to apartheid policies.
- Post-Apartheid Adjustments: After apartheid ended in 1994, some white South Africans struggled with economic shifts, land reform policies, and changing social dynamics.
- The number of unauthorized immigrants entering the U.S. annually is over 2 million in 2023; in 2024, U.S. Customs and Border Protection reported nearly 3 million encounters with unauthorized migrants.
This includes apprehensions, expulsions, and inadmissibility at the border. As of the most recent estimates, around 11 million unauthorized immigrants reside in the United States today.
- The number of authorized immigrants entering the U.S. annually is around 1 million; these people have obtained lawful permanent resident status (green cards) annually through family-sponsored immigrants,
employment-based immigrants, and refugees, among others.
- In February 2025, a U.S. military plane transported about 100 Indian migrants back to India. Also, 119 migrants from various countries, including China, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Uzbekistan, were transported by a U.S. military plane
to Panama; they were expected to be moved to a shelter in Panama's Darien region before being returned to their respective countries; this is the first of three planned flights, with a total of about 360 people expected to be deported
in this manner. These migrants entered the U.S. illegally or overstayed their visa.
- The number of Chinese nationals and Indian nationals encountered at the U.S.-Mexico border has increased significantly, they tried to migrate to the U.S., often illegally. In fiscal year 2024, the U.S. authorities encountered 78,701 Chinese
nationals and 90,415 Indian nationals, which are a substantial rise from 27,756 and 63,927 in 2022, respectively. This upward trend is indicative of several underlying factors, such as economic opportunities, political stability, social freedom,
and other personal reasons.
- During a campaign rally on July 13, 2024 for his re-election near Butler, Pennsylvania, former President Donald Trump was shot
and ducked to the ground as several Secret Service agents rushed to the stage and surrounded him on all sides, and took him to safety. A 20-year-old gunman, who fired multiple shots, injuring Trump’s right ear, killing one spectator, and critically injuring two others;
Secret Service agents neutralized the shooter who the FBI identified as Thomas Matthew Crooks. Trump said the motive wasn't clear. The incident has marked one of the most
serious acts of political violence in the U.S.
- From 1941 to 1945, six million Jews were killed by the Nazi Germany and its collaborators.
Nazi Germany also killed over 5 million non-Jews, which include Gypsies, Poles,
communists, homosexuals,
Soviet POWs, and the mentally and physically disabled people.
- The situation for women and girls in Afghanistan has become increasingly dire under Taliban rule. Since their takeover in August 2021, the Taliban have issued numerous decrees restricting women's rights, including banning girls from education
beyond the sixth grade and preventing women from working in many sectors. Women have been systematically removed from public life, with no representation in leadership positions at national or provincial levels. Even within their own homes,
many Afghan women report having little to no influence over household decisions. The Taliban have also imposed strict regulations on women's movement, requiring them to have a male guardian when traveling and enforcing dress codes with severe
consequences for non-compliance.
- In Afghanistan women and girls are being deprived of their dignity, rights and status at home and in the society.
The Taliban has enforced punitive laws restricting women's lives, and the government has been institutionalizing large-scale and systematic gender-based discrimination and violence against women and girls and limiting their education and rights.
Women have no rights to movement, no rights to education, and no rights to work. Women must cover their faces in public, and they are not allowed to go to parks and gyms; the government issued orders for girls aged 12-18 to stay home,
and prohibited them to go to high school.
- The Saudi government has been accused of and denounced by various international organizations and governments for violating human rights within the country. For example,
Ali al-Nimr was arrested at the age of 17 for his participation in the
2011 Arab Spring protests, and was sentenced to death by beheading at the age of 18. Saudi Arabia sentenced
the Saudi scholar Hassan al-Maliki to death; Al-Maliki has been behind bars since 2017 on multiple "charges", including “conducting
interviews with western news outlets” and “owning books” that are unauthorized by the Saudi government. Working conditions for the large expatriate labor force are often exploitative; racism in Saudi Arabia extends
to allegations of imprisonment, physical abuse, rape, overwork and wage theft, especially of foreign workers who are given little protections under the law. Saudi women face discrimination in many aspects of their lives;
for example, they cannot file police reports without the permission of a male guardian, and may end up being imprisoned by the government for complaining. Men are free to abuse women in Saudi Arabia, with reports of
women being locked in their rooms for months or threatened with starvation or shooting for offenses such as getting the wrong kind of haircut or being in a relationship with a man the family has not approved.
Although women make up 70% of those enrolled in universities, they only make up 5% of the workforce in Saudi Arabia, the lowest proportion in the world.
- Saudi Arabia (the largest economy in the Middle East
and the 18th largest in the world) restricts almost all political rights and civil liberties. The king combines legislative, executive, and judicial function, and also
serves as the prime minister, and presides over the Council of Ministers of Saudi Arabia and Consultative
Assembly of Saudi Arabia. The royal family dominates the political system. No officials at the national level are elected. Women and religious minorities are mostly excluded from leadership positions in the government, and face
extensive discrimination. Saudi
Arabia has judicial corporal punishment systems that include amputations
of hands and feet for robbery, and flogging for lesser
crimes such as "sexual deviance" and drunkenness. It was reported that women were sentenced to lashes for adultery even they were actually victims of rape.
Companies operating or planning to invest in Saudi Arabia face a moderate to high risk of corruption. In 2018, the government
charged 126 local government employees across the country with corruption, abuse of power and other crimes as part of a controversial
anti-corruption campaign that started in 2017, and it has ended this sweeping crackdown on corruption recovered more than $106bn through settlements with scores of senior princes, ministers and top businessmen.
- People often believe that in Saudi Arabia, women's rights challenges remain, including issues related to guardianship laws, labor rights, and societal expectations. For example, the male guardianship has restricted women's autonomy, requiring them to seek permission
from male relatives for various aspects of life, including travel and employment. Migrant domestic workers, particularly from Kenya, have faced severe exploitation, racism, and exclusion from labor protections, with reports of extreme
working conditions and abuse. Groups like Amnesty International and MENA Rights Group urge Saudi Arabia to comply with international human rights treaties, such as the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW).
- Saudi Arabia has been called an epicenter of sex segregation, stemming partially from its conservative Sunni Islamic practices and partially from its monarchy's legal constraints. Women experience widespread discrimination
in Saudi politics, economy and society. For example, in Saudi Arabia, the law allows a man to control a Saudi woman's life from her birth until her death; if a woman is seen socializing with a man who is not a relative, the government
will charge her with committing adultery, fornication, or prostitution; the government does not allow women to have the right to unilaterally end a marriage, only men have the unconditional right to initiate a divorce.
- In addition to expressing growing concern over the Chinese government’s human rights violations in China and its repression in Xinjiang, Tibet, and Hong Kong, many countries around the world
have criticized China for its partnership with Russia. China, Russia's most valuable ally,
has repeatedly criticized Western sanctions against Russia, refused to follow other nations in leveling stiff economic sanctions against Russia for its invasion of Ukraine, rejected to
condemn the Russian invasion, routinely amplifies Russian disinformation about the Ukraine-Russia's conflict, and does not refer to it as an invasion or a war in keeping with Russian practice.
- The Myanmar (Burma) military staged a coup on February 1, 2021, nullifying the results of the November 2020 elections and arbitrarily detaining hundreds of politicians, activists, and civil servants.
Myanmar has been in chaos since the Army seized power and detained elected government leader Aung San Suu Kyi and much of her party leadership after the coup alleging fraud in the election her party won in a landslide. Hundreds of thousands of people in Myanmar have
marched against the military junta to protest the coup. The military coup forces have confronted peaceful demonstrations, arrested thousands of people, and used lethal weapons to
shoot demonstrators. They have fired on protesters around the country, including Lashio in the northeast, Myeik in the deep south and Hpa-An in the east; as of March 20, 2021
Myanmar’s security forces have killed at least 235 people, wounded hundreds of others, and arrested more than 2,330 people,
in violent crackdowns against opposition to the coup.
- On 1/19/2021 the US has officially determined that China
is committing genocide and crimes against Uyghur people and religious minority groups. In China, since early 2017 the government has imprisoned more than 1 million people in the western Xinjiang region, including Uighurs and
other mostly Muslim ethnic groups, in a vast network of concentration camps. China authorities have
discriminated against these people by restricting their freedom to travel, emigrating, and attending schools, and denying other basic human rights of assembly, speech, and worship, and forcing men, women and children into
at least 380 concentration camps, where they have been subjected to torture, sterilization and political indoctrination in addition
to forced labor
as part of an assimilation campaign in a region whose inhabitants are ethnically and culturally distinct from the Han Chinese majority. While China has encouraged Han majority in Xinjiang to have more children, the government has slashed birth rates among Uighurs and other minorities by forcing intrauterine devices, sterilization and even
abortion on hundreds of thousands as part of a sweeping campaign to curb the Uighurs population; having more than children is a major reason Uighurs and minor people are sent to
prison camps in Xinjiang. China's actions and policies developed to discriminate against Muslim Uighurs and ethnic minorities constitute “crimes against humanity” and
a “genocide.”
- More than 1 million people - mostly from the Muslim Uighur community in China - are though to have been detailed without trial. These people literally do not know how long they are kept in the prison.
A leak document reveals how every aspect of a detainee's life is monitored and controlled: "The students should have a fixed bed position, fixed queue position,
fixed classroom seat, and fixed station during skills work, and it is strictly forbidden for this to be changed". The Chinese government has consistently claimed the camps in the far western Xinjiang region offer voluntary education and training.
But official documents show how inmates are locked up, and indoctrinated and punished. "It's a total transformation that is designed specifically to wipe the Muslim Uighurs of Xinjiang as a separate cultural group off the face of the Earth."
China has sought for years
to assimilate the Muslim Uighur population into the majority Han Chinese, partially by flooding Xinjiang province with migrants from elsewhere. But the effort to crush the population has recently picked up speed. This is an actionable piece of evidence,
documenting a gross human rights violation.
- The Chinese government has described its efforts in Xinjiang as a benevolent campaign to curb extremism by training people to find better jobs.
But the documents reveal the party’s efforts to organize a ruthless campaign of mass detention in the name of curbing terrorism, a program whose
consequences they discussed with cool detachment. When children asked the Chinese government about the disappearance of their parents and families
detained in camps built to hold Muslim minorities "Since it’s just training, why can’t they come home?", they were told ". It seems that you’re still misunderstanding how concentrated education is run. Usually, you would return home for winter or summer vacation
without any problem. But if you were careless and caught an infectious virus like SARS, you’d have to undergo enclosed, isolated treatment, because it’s an infectious illness. If you weren’t thoroughly cured, as soon as you returned home you would infect your
family with this virus, and your whole family would fall ill."
- Xinjiang is officially designated an autonomous region within China, like Tibet to its south.
Uighurs, who are ethnically Turkic Muslims, make up about 45% of the Xinjiang region's population; 40% are Han Chinese.
Uyghurs in Xinjiang suffer under a "fully-fledged police state" with extensive controls and restrictions upon their religious, cultural and social life because the Chinese government tightly controls religious expression and freedom
in Xinjiang by imposing rules on the Uighur community. More than 1 million Uighurs are being tortured and “politically brainwashed” in camps and prisons in China while China insisted that
the camps are voluntary education centers that help purge “ideological diseases". Despite growing evidence of forced
labor and torture in custody, indoctrination and other abuses in Xinjiang, Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia, Iran and Pakistan have remained relatively silent on the issue while the governments of Malaysia,
Indonesia and Turkey have voiced concerns about the Uighurs.
- The third person most associated with mass deaths in the bloodiest of human centuries after Germany's Adolf Hitler and Soviet's Joseph Stalin is
China's Mao Zedong. During the period of 1949 and ended with his death in 1976,
Mao Zedong was in some way responsible for
80 million deaths or more, including 1.2 million Tibetan people.
In comparison, Hitler is blamed for 12 million concentration camp deaths and at least 30 million other deaths associated with World War II, while Stalin is believed responsible for between 30 million and 40 million "unnatural deaths".
- As a result of an investigation, on July 21, 2020 the US ordered to close the Chinese Houston (TX) Consulate, which was part of a large Chinese espionage
effort using diplomatic facilities around the US. The consulate was a nest of Chinese spies who tried to steal research data,
science and technology from facilities in Texas, including the Texas A&M medical system and The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Centre in Houston. The consulate, which was directed to close in order to protect American intellectual property and Americans' private
information, was the first (consulate) established in 1979 after the US and China established diplomatic relations. Relations between the US and China have plummeted, amid an ongoing trade war, the coronavirus pandemic, and US criticism of China's human rights abuses in
Hong Kong and Xinjiang.
- In the US, China has engaged for years in massive illegal spying and influence operations and that those activities have increased markedly in scale and scope over the past few years. China spends a widespread effort to steal U.S.
military technology and classified information and
the trade secrets of U.S. companies. US prosecutors charged two
Chinese hackers working for the China government, both nationals and residents of the People’s Republic of China (China), with stealing coronavirus treatment and vaccine research in the US. They are hacking into the computer systems of
hundreds of victim companies, governments, non-governmental organizations, and individual dissidents, clergy, and democratic and human rights activists in the US and abroad, including Hong Kong and China. They began as early as 2009 and are still going on, stole intellectual
property and trade secrets worth hundreds of millions of dollars.
- China has a long history of propaganda and efforts to cajole the world into following its own narrative on geopolitical and conflict issues like Tibet,
Hong Kong, Taiwan, and South China Sea.
Its newest propaganda is COVID-19, a new SARS coronavirus disease, first reported in Hubei, a city in central China of 11 million, in late December 2019, by
suppressing information about the coronavirus’ origin, downplaying by a factor of 15 to 40 times of the number of cases of coronavirus and its seriousness to the rest of the world,
and maintaining through mid-January 2020 that this coronavirus wasn't even contagious. China has been lying since early December 2019
about the nature of the new coronavirus by firmly telling the world that it couldn’t be transmitted between humans, and continually reported wrongly low number of coronavirus cases and deaths in the country. Its propaganda resulted in causing or contributing over 1,192,025
coronavirus cases and 64,085+ deaths worldwide (as of April 4, 2020). Taking advantage of the COVID-19 outbreak, the country has increased exerting military pressure on Taiwan,
coercing and bullying its neighbors, and seriously violating sovereignty in
the South China Sea.
- China's underreporting of its pandemic totals was unsurprising, and official statistics from the country are often lies. Unlike South Korea,
China did not test vast amounts of people so those who may have died and not tested for COVID-19 were unlikely to be counted in the official tally. For the Hubei province, including Wuhan,
on January 25, 2020 the official figure was only nearly 6,000 confirmed coronavirus cases and just over 200 deaths. However, the University of Hong Kong
reported in The Lancet, they estimated that 75,815 individuals have been infected in Wuhan as of that day. As of March 31, 2020 China’s government has reported only 3,000 deaths in the Hubei province,
where Wuhan is located — a number that Wuhan’s residents have rejected as a full order of magnitude too small. Unlike China, in Indonesia, President Joko Widodo admitted in March 2020,
the government had filtered information about the spread of the virus saying "we don't want to make the public panic, we don't want to cause unrest in the society". A study by the London-based Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases released in late March estimates that as few as 2% of
Indonesia's coronavirus infections have been reported. That would bring the true number to more than 89,000 but a serious lack of testing, as with many other nations, means we will never be sure.
- After the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, the US was determined to retaliate. On March 10, 1945 over 100,000
Japanese people were killed and another million injured, most of them civilians, when more than 300 American B-29 bombers dropped 1,500 tons of firebombs on the Japanese capital, Tokyo, that night.
The human toll that night exceeded that of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and
Nagasaki later that year, where the initial blasts killed about 70,000 people and 46,000 people respectively. The US B29 bombers were the culmination of 20 years of aviation advances
leading up to World War II and were the first to have pressurized, heated fuselages, enabling them to operate above 18,000 feet without crews having to don special gear or use oxygen masks. Several weeks before attacking Tokyo,
Allied bombing raids on February 13–15, 1945, that almost completely destroyed the German city of
Dresden. On the night of February 13, the British Bomber Command hit Dresden with an 800-bomber air raid, dropping some 2,700 tons of
bombs, including large numbers of incendiaries. Aided by weather conditions, a firestorm developed, incinerating tens of thousands of people.
The U.S. Eighth Air Force followed the next day with another 400 tons of bombs and carried out yet another raid by 210 bombers on February 15. It is thought that some 25,000–35,000 civilians died in Dresden in the air attacks, though some estimates are as high as 250,000, given the influx of undocumented
refugees that had fled to Dresden from the Eastern Front. Most of the victims were women, children, and the elderly.
- The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has faced criticism for its mass trials of Emirati dissidents, which have been condemned by human rights organizations. In 2023, 78 individuals were prosecuted under broad counterterrorism laws, many of whom
were human rights activists, academics, and political dissidents. Some were sentenced to life imprisonment, raising concerns about due process violations and freedom of expression. For example,
- Lack of Transparency: Many defendants faced secretive legal proceedings, with limited access to legal representation and fair trial guarantees.
- Political Suppression: The charges were politically motivated, targeting individuals advocating for government reforms, human rights, and free speech.
- International Condemnation: Organizations like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch criticized the UAE for using vague national security laws to silence dissent.
- The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has been accused of transnational repression, targeting dissidents abroad and using intimidation tactics against their families as a form of collective punishment. For example,
- Dissidents and their relatives have been designated as "terrorists" under broad counterterrorism laws, often without due process.
- Families of exiled dissidents face travel bans, citizenship revocations, and blocked access to education and employment.
- The UAE has expanded its surveillance capabilities, monitoring dissidents abroad and harassing their relatives at home.
- Businesses owned by dissidents have been blacklisted, leading to asset freezes and reputational damage.
- Authorities have used intimidation tactics, including intermittent questioning and psychological harassment.
- ToTok is most popular in the United Arab Emirates (U.A.E.), but also serves millions of users in Africa, Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and North America.
The company that created ToTok, Breej Holding, is believed to be a front group for an Abu Dhabi-based hacking firm called DarkMatter.
But the service, ToTok, is actually a spying tool. It is used by the government of the U.A.E. to try to track every conversation, movement, relationship,
appointment, sound and image of those who install it on their phones. Google removed it from its store
on 12/19/2019, and Apple followed suit on 12/20/2019.
- Based on the National Security Law (NSL) introduced by China in Hong Kong on June 30, 2020, in March 2024, Hong Kong enacted the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance (SNSO), which has criminalized secession, subversion, terrorism, and
collusion with foreign forces, treason, insurrection, sabotage, external interference, sedition, theft of state secrets, and espionage. Since the implementation of these laws, people, activists, journalists, and former lawmakers have been
arrested, and press freedom has declined. Some trials under the NSJ/SNSO are held behind closed doors, and individuals suspected of violating
the law can be wiretapped and put under surveillance. The laws also apply to non-permanent residents and individuals outside Hong Kong, meaning that even those living abroad can be charged. Beijing has the final authority over how the law is
interpreted, and if it conflicts with Hong Kong laws, the Beijing law takes priority. These laws have faced international criticism for their broad provisions and potential impact on human rights, including freedom of expression.
- The National Security Law (NSL) has significantly restricted free speech in Hong Kong. Since its implementation on June 30, 2020, authorities have arrested activists, journalists, politicians and people for expressing political views.
The law has led to the closure of independent media outlets, such as Apple Daily, which was forced to shut down after its executives were arrested. Public protests and political slogans that were once common in Hong Kong have been criminalized,
with individuals facing lengthy prison sentences for chanting pro-democracy phrases. The NSL has also expanded government surveillance, making people hesitant to express dissent online or in public.
- Since the National Security Law (NSL) was enacted in 2020, authorities have received 890,000 tip-offs through a national security hotline, leading to multiple arrests;
over 300 individuals have been
arrested for national security offenses. For example,
- Jimmy Lai: The founder of Apple Daily, a pro-democracy newspaper, was charged with collusion with foreign forces and subversion; his newspaper was forced to shut down.
- Chow Hang-tung: A prominent barrister and activist, she was arrested for allegedly directing others to post seditious content on social media ahead of the June 4 Tiananmen Square anniversary.
- Hong Kong 47 Case: This was Hong Kong’s largest national security trial, where 45 pro-democracy activists were sentenced to four to ten years in prison for subversion; they were accused of organizing
an unofficial primary election to select opposition candidates for local elections.
- Six individuals were arrested in May 2024: They were accused of using a Facebook page to incite hatred against the Chinese and Hong Kong governments.
- Individuals arrested under the National Security Law (NSL) in Hong Kong face severe legal consequences, including:
- Lengthy Prison Sentences: The NSL allows for life imprisonment for serious offenses such as subversion and collusion with foreign forces.
- Asset Freezing: Authorities can freeze bank accounts and seize assets of those charged under the NSL.
- Restricted Bail: Bail is rarely granted, as suspects must prove they will not continue to endanger national security.
- Extradition to Mainland China: In some cases, individuals can be transferred to mainland China, where they face different legal standards.
- Social and Professional Consequences: Many arrested individuals lose their jobs, and some face harassment or pressure on their families.
- The legal process for individuals arrested under the National Security Law (NSL) in Hong Kong differs from regular criminal proceedings.
- Police Investigatory Powers: Under Article 43 of the NSL, authorities have expanded surveillance powers, including searches without warrants, freezing assets, and restricting movement of suspects.
- Designated Judges: Cases under the NSL are handled by judges appointed by the Chief Executive, raising concerns about judicial independence.
- Pre-Trial Detention: Bail is rarely granted, as suspects must prove they will not continue to endanger national security.
- Closed-Door Trials: Some cases are not open to the public, and jury trials are not guaranteed.
- Beijing’s Authority: If deemed necessary, cases can be transferred to mainland China, where defendants face different legal standards.
- In Hong Kong, possession of items like zip ties—commonly used as cable fasteners—has, in certain contexts, led to arrests, especially when authorities interpret them as potential tools for unlawful assembly or protest-related
activities. Under the Summary Offences Ordinance (Cap. 228), individuals may face up to 2 years in jail for carrying objects deemed to have unlawful intent, though this typically applies when combined with other suspicious behavior.
More significantly, under the National Security Law and the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance (SNSO), which came into effect in 2020 and 2024 respectively, individuals can face up to 10 years or more in prison for offenses
such as subversion, secession, or collusion with foreign forces—charges that have been applied broadly and controversially. Critics argue that the laws are vague and expansive, allowing authorities to interpret ordinary objects
or actions—such as carrying a pen allegedly used to forge signatures—as potential threats to national security. While the Hong Kong government maintains that these laws target only a small minority who endanger national security,
human rights organizations have documented numerous cases where peaceful expression or symbolic items were treated as criminal evidence, raising concerns about overreach and erosion of civil liberties.
- In today's Hong Kong, people can be arrested for publishing children's books. The Hong Kong government has found five people guilty of publishing
children's books telling about a village of sheep trying to fight back against a group of wolves who are trying to take over their settlement. These cartoon e-books
have been interpreted by authorities as having an overtly political message. The Hong Kong government has been worried that the books' young readers would be led to believe that Chinese authorities were coming to Hong Kong with the "wicked intentions" of ruining the lives of the
city's inhabitants. Hong Kong police and prosecutors regularly use the national security law to clamp
down on political speech and views.
- In Hong Kong people can be caught for carrying zip tie (also known as a hose tie, cable tie, or tie wrap), which a type of short plastic
fastener for holding items together, primarily electrical cables and wires. They can be punishable
by up to 2 years in jail under the Summary Offences Ordinance, and the new charge carries a maximum jail sentence of 10 years under the Crimes Ordinance of "National Security Law". This strange law can be interpreted so broadly
that people can be arrested and kept in jail for carrying a pen to "forge signatures".
- Hong Kong authorities have rapidly begun to apply the new National Security Law to prosecute peaceful speech, curtail academic freedom, and generate a chilling
effect on fundamental freedoms in the city. The law, which China’s government imposed on June 30, 2020, include creating specialized secret security agencies, denying fair
trial rights, providing sweeping new powers to the police, increasing restraints on civil society and the media, and weakening judicial oversight. It's Beijing’s most aggressive assault on Hong Kong people’s freedoms
since Britain handed over its former colony, Hong Kong, in 1997. China pledged to preserve the “one country, two systems” framework through 2047; however, China has seen Hong Kong as part of its territory and applied vague laws against Hong Kong people.
These include the use of intimidation, covert surveillance,
enforced disappearances, arbitrary detention, and torture and
deaths in custody of activists, rights
lawyers, and journalists.
Hong Kong people face the prospect of lengthy prison terms for possessing banners or chanting slogans that the authorities dislike. As a result, the United States and
many countries no longer treat Hong Kong and China separately on several major issues, including trade and extradition. Hong Kong became just like another Chinese city.
- Until 1997, Hong Kong was ruled by Britain as a colony but then returned to China under the "one country, two systems" arrangement. Unlike other cities in China, which are tightly governed by the authoritarian central government,
Hong Kong is a semi-autonomous city with its own legal and political systems, and its people have more rights. However, the Chinese government actively interfered in Hong Kong's affairs and created bills to control and take away Hong Kong people's rights.
As of today, almost no Hong Kong youth identified themselves as Chinese. Since the summer of 2019, Hong Kong protesters (driven by a sense of desperation rather than hope)
began fighting these bills to protect Hong Kong’s autonomy from China. Protesters feared the bills would allow China to encroach on these rare freedoms.
As the protests have continued, they are posing a challenge to the city's government and Beijing. The "special" relationship of Hong Kong's leadership with mainland China is a key element in untangling this mess.
- In Hong Kong, China demands to implement a law that would criminalize secession, subversion of state power, terrorist activities and colluding with
foreign forces to endanger national security. Critics say Hong Kong’s legal statutes already account for such matters and that Beijing is determined to use the law to pursue political opponents. China has long demanded such a law for Hong Kong,
but efforts were shelved in the face of massive protests in 2003.
- In order to take a firm rhetorical stance, saying the protests "showed signs of terrorism",
China and Hong Hong government are using threats and pressure to get business to back its increasingly hard-line stance toward
Hong Kong, leading companies to warn and intimidate workers who
speak out in protest. For example, HSBC, the London bank, was threatened because it has slowly backed Beijing’s push to enact a new national security law covering the territory, and two Chinese banks, Chiyu Banking and Wing Lung Bank, had pressured their employees to
sign a petition supporting the law, by forcing them to sign a petition and taking screenshot of their signature and share it publicly.
- China and Hong Kong government have pressured various companies, including railway operator MTR Corporation, airline Cathay Pacific, and
the Big Four accounting firms (KPMG, Ernst & Young (EY), Deloitte and PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) - in Hong Kong)
to take a hard-line approach against employees who took part in the protests. Cathay Pacific witnessed a huge managerial reshuffling and fired pro-democratic employees after the Civil Aviation Administration of China
threatened to block Cathay's access to Chinese airspace while the MTR has closed stations and has ended its service early after being criticized for transporting protesters. The world's "Big 4" accounting firms have confirmed they stand with China by
distancing themselves from a newspaper advertisement in which their employees expressed support for Hong Kong
protesters. Chinese state media outlets largely ignored the Hong Kong protests, which were also mostly
censored from Mainland Chinese social media.
- As China tightens its grip on Hong Kong over which British rule ended 20
years ago, pro-democracy activists are still fighting against erosion of freedoms. Since May 2019, thousands of people in Hong Kong gathered and peacefully marched
for pro-democracy protests, which had seen numerous clashes between protesters and police with police firing tear gas at demonstrators as the
city's protests enter their 13th weekend to demand some basic freedom requests, such as the full withdrawal of the suspended extradition bill and implementation of open and free elections. The Hong Kong public’s
response to police violence shows that people are willing to put their bodies on the line for freedom.
More than one million people being drawn to the streets twice in a week in June, only to have many
of their demands ignored, is a sign of a serious democratic deficit. On September 2, tens of thousands students boycotted
the first day of classes as part of a citywide strike.
- The Chinese Communist Party has in effect controlled the Hong Kong government, and infringed on freedom of speech and movement.
For example, after Hong Kong Professional Teachers Union organized for its members and students to join the general strike on August 5, 2019,
the Government's Regional Education Offices asked all schools for names of the teachers and pupils who participated in the strike, hinting at possible future retribution. The Government installed lampposts used for carrying facial recognition
function and infringing upon personal privacy of citizens, and protesters attempted to tear down or dismantle them. Hong Kong leader, Carrie Lam, was sorry for
causing “unforgivable havoc” by igniting the political crisis engulfing the city and she would quit if she had a choice!.
- In 2019 million people in Hong Kong protested to demand a full withdrawal of the extradition bill, dismissal of charges against arrested protesters, a government retraction regarding the term "riot", an independent investigation into police
brutality, and universal suffrage. Beijing imposed a sweeping national security law, under which the government has had all but wiped out formal opposition. Authorities have raided and closed down newsrooms, jailed activists and protesters,
unseated elected lawmakers, heightened censorship both online and in printed publications, and changed school curricula. The city has been transformed beyond recognition since.
- Hong Kong’s human rights record took a dark turn. Civil liberties in Hong Kong are increasingly being undermined by the growing interference of the central government,
20 years after the city returned to Chinese sovereignty in 1997. In April 2018, Hong Kong police arrested 11 pro-democracy advocates on charges including “unlawful assembly” and “obstructing police.” The
charges stem from the advocates’ protest against a decision by China’s top legislative body forcing Hong Kong courts to disqualify two pro-independence legislators. In July 2018 a Hong Kong court disqualified
four more pro-democracy lawmakers for modifying their oaths swearing allegiance to China in a 2016 ceremony.
- Until 22 May 2014 the politics of Thailand were conducted within the framework of a constitutional monarchy, whereby the prime minister
is the head of government and a hereditary monarch is head of state. The judiciary is independent of the executive and the legislative branches. Since the coup d'état
of 22 May 2014, Thailand revoked its 2007 constitution. The 2007 Constitution was annulled by the 2014 coup-makers who run the country as a military dictatorship. The country has been under the rule of a military organization called
National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO), which has taken control of the national administration, and abolished the national assembly and assumed the
responsibilities of the legislative branch. Military courts have been tasked to be responsible for most cases that are normally under the civilian courts. The
NCPO has repeatedly postponed promised elections, fearing that the pro-Thaksin Pheu Thai Party would do well despite the junta’s election laws and rules that are expressly designed to disadvantage Pheu Thai.
- The politics of Italy are conducted through a parliamentary republic with a multi-party system.
Italy has been a democratic republic
since 2 June 1946, when the monarchy was abolished by popular referendum
and a constituent assembly was elected to draft a constitution, which was promulgated on 1 January 1948.
Italy has had more than 50 governments and more than 20 Prime Ministers since 1945.
- Saudis close to Crown Prince, Mohammed bin Salman Al Saud, discussed
killing other enemies a year before Khashoggi’s death, and used coercion and abuse to seize billions.
- The Turkish lira tumbled more than 16 percent on August 10, 2018 - a record low against the dollar - after the US announced the punitive doubling of steel and
aluminum tariffs, to compel it to turn over a jailed American pastor in Turkey; the US is the biggest destination for Turkish steel exports with 11 percent of the Turkish export volume. Mr Erdogan, the Turkey president,
who has consolidated unprecedented power through a series of referendums, framed Turkey's crisis as a “national battle” against economic enemies, including the US.
- Corruption in Cambodia has led to serious human rights abuses, including arbitrary arrests, torture, and suppression of free speech. For example,
- Judicial Corruption: The judiciary lacks independence, with courts often favoring government officials and wealthy individuals; this results in unfair trials and politically motivated convictions.
- Abusive "War on Drugs": Cambodia's anti-drug campaign has led to arbitrary arrests, torture, and overcrowded prisons; poor and marginalized individuals are disproportionately targeted, and detainees face inhumane conditions and denial of healthcare.
- Suppression of Journalists: Reporters who investigate corruption or criticize the government face censorship, threats, and unjustified arrests; some have been imprisoned under vague legal charges.
- Political Repression: Opposition members and activists are often harassed, detained, or forced into exile; the government has been accused of transnational repression, targeting critics beyond Cambodia’s borders.
- Cambodia has faced significant challenges related to corruption and government oppression. Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index ranks Cambodia 158 out of 180 countries, with a score of 21/100, indicating a high level
of corruption. The country's judicial system has been identified as a major source of corruption, contributing to Cambodia being ranked as the most corrupt nation in the region. In Cambodia corruption is pervasive in various aspects of daily
life, including medical services, traffic violations, and court verdicts. Businesses often encounter red tape and bribery when obtaining licenses and permits, particularly in the construction sector. The Anti-Corruption Law does not protect
whistleblowers, and those who report corruption without sufficient proof can face imprisonment.
- Hun Sen's government has been widely criticized for its human rights record in Cambodia. Under his leadership, there have been severe restrictions on freedom of expression, peaceful assembly, and press freedom. His administration has targeted
independent media, arrested political opponents, and imposed harsh limitations on labor rights. Human Rights Watch has documented a long history of rights abuses by Hun Sen’s government, including extrajudicial killings, arbitrary arrests,
and suppression of opposition parties. His government has also been accused of transnational repression, harassing critics and exiled opposition members living abroad. In 2020, the European Union suspended Cambodia’s preferential trade
agreement due to concerns over human rights violations. Despite international pressure, reports indicate that Cambodia continues to curtail civil liberties and silence dissent.
- Under the Prime Minister Hun Sen’s leadership Cambodia's opposition leader Kem Sokha was sentenced to 27 years in jail for treason. Critics argue that the charges were politically motivated to prevent him from participating in the
country's elections. Sokha was accused of conspiring with foreign powers to overthrow Prime Minister Hun Sen's government, a claim he has consistently denied. His party, the Cambodia National Rescue Party (CNRP), was dissolved by
Cambodia’s Supreme Court two months after his arrest. Rights groups and Western governments have condemned the verdict, calling it a miscarriage of justice.
- The Cambodia government under the Prime Minister Hun Sen’s leadership arrested
the leader of Cambodia’s political opposition on dubious charges of treason; dissolved the main opposition party and banned over 100 members from political activity; intensified the misuse of the justice system to prosecute political opposition
and human rights activists; and forced several independent media outlets to close; he ordered internet service providers to block independent news websites, including Radio Free Asia, Voice of America and Voice of Democracy, in the days leading
up to and during the election.
- Prime Minister Hun Sen, one of the world’s longest serving leaders – seeked to prolong his 33-year grip on power in the national vote set for July 29, 2018 and has used the courts to cripple his opponents,
warned that people who curses or insults him would eventually die without a plot of land to bury their bodies. After voting, Prime Minister Hun Sen said his party won every seat in Parliament. The Chinese Foreign Ministry, which sent observers to Cambodia even as Western monitors stayed
away for fear of legitimizing the polls, deemed the elections a "success".
- A Laos hydroelectric dam that was under construction collapsed on July 23, 2018, sending flash floods through six villages, and killing many people and flooding villages in the southern province of Attapeu. Over 7,000 people were displaced and hundreds more were missing.
Laos, a landlocked, communist state that is largely isolated from the rest of the world, is one of Asia’s poorest countries. China, Laos and Cambodia have begun massive hydroelectric development programs, with more than a dozen dams planned, under construction or completed on the main river and many more dams on tributaries.
The dam that collapsed is part of the Xe-Pian Xe-Namnoy hydroelectric power project, which involves Laotian, Thai and South Korean firms.
- Vietnam issued a contentious cybersecurity law, which requires global tech companies such as Google and Facebook to store user data in Vietnam,
open offices in the country and remove offending contents within 24 hours at the request of the Ministry of Information and Communications and the specialized cybersecurity task-force under the Ministry of Public Security.
Around 57% of Vietnam’s 93 million people have Facebook accounts and about 65 million people are online, the new policy has potentially devastating consequences for freedom of expression.
- An intricate network of companies controlled by the family of longtime Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen, the world’s sixth-longest-serving premier, has amassed a
secret fortune with a value of at least $200 million and possibly between “$500 million and $4 billion”.
Hun Sen's financial links into 114 domestic, private companies controlled or owned outright by members of Hun Sen’s family
and their links to big international brands, such as Apple, Nokia, Visa, Unilever, Procter & Gamble, Nestlé, Durex and Honda, and many others. Wealth is a sensitive issue for Hun Sen, who has said he makes a wage of just $1,150 a month after 30 years in the job. While Hun Sen’s wealth is vast, on a regional level his family effort pales
when comparing with Malaysia’s Taib Mahmud, who is by far the richest;
Taib ruled the East Malaysian state of Sarawak for 33 years and retired with a
family fortune valued at more than $20 billion and held through a network of 400 companies. In 2015, Malaysia's Prime Minister, Najib Tun Razak, was accused of
channelling over RM 2.67 billion (USD $681 million) from 1MDB,
a government-run strategic development company, to his personal bank accounts; he declared that the "money was a personal donation from Saudi Arabia’s royal family".
More than $1 billion entered Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak's personal bank accounts, much of it from state investment fund 1MDB.
- Effective October 8, 2017 the U.S. has suspended all non-immigrant visa services at all U.S. diplomatic facilities in Turkey following the arrest of a consulate employee, and
Turkish markets slammed after the U.S. suspended visa.
- In July 2017 China quickly cremated its only Nobel Peace Prize laureate, Liu Xiaobo, the country's most famous political prisoner.
Liu was a Chinese literary critic, writer, poet, anti-communist, human rights activist
and Nobel Peace Prize laureate who called for political reforms and was involved in campaigns to end Communist
single-party rule. He championed non-violent resistance as a way of overcoming “forceful tyranny”, and had been serving an 11-year jail sentence for demanding an end to one-party rule when he was
diagnosed with late-stage liver cancer in May 2017. On 8 December 2008, Liu was detained due to his participation with the
Charter 08 manifesto, and was formally arrested on 23 June 2009 on suspicion of "inciting subversion of state power".
Like Liu Xiaobo, many Chinese
political activists have been detained, jailed or exiled for their pro-democracy or
rights defending activities in China.
- Although the 1982 constitution guarantees freedom of speech, the Chinese government often uses the "subversion of state power" and
"protection of state secrets" clauses in their law system to imprison those who criticize the government. The government controls the media and Internet censorship very tighhly. The government maintains censorship over all media capable of reaching a wide audience. This includes television, print media, radio,
film, theater, text messaging, instant messaging, video games, literature, and the Internet. At least 40 Chinese journalists and 74 Netizens were reportedly imprisoned in China since 2014.
China’s prisons held more than 100 journalists, citizen-journalists and bloggers, including a Nobel peace laureate and three winners of the Reporters Without Borders (RSF)-TV5 Monde Press Freedom Prize, as of June 2017.
- China wants its minorities, Tibetans and Uyghurs,
to sing and dance on TV – but do little else, the government exoticises, and marginalises, its non-Han Chinese ethnic groups.
Since February 2009, at least 122 Tibetans have set themselves on fire as a grimin protest China and most have died from their wounds.
- Little is publicly known of identity of the man who stood in front of a column of tanks on June 5, 1989, the morning after the Chinese military had suppressed the
Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 by force. The British tabloid Sunday Express named him as Wang Weilin (王维林), a 19-year-old student,
who was later charged with "political hooliganism" and "attempting to subvert members of the People's Liberation Army. However, this claim has been rejected by an internal Communist Party of China,
which reported that they could not find the man based on statements made by a reliable party member, "We can’t find him, we got his name from journalists, we have checked through computers but can’t find him among the dead or among those in prison,". There were at least 300, and perhaps thousands,
of the protesters had been killed and as many as 10,000 were arrested after Chinese troops and security police stormed through Tiananmen Square, firing indiscriminately into the crowds of protesters. There are several conflicting stories about what happened to this young man after the demonstration; among these sources he was arrested and executed
by a firing squad. However, in a 1990 interview with Barbara Walters, then-CPC General Secretary Jiang Zemin
was asked what became of the man, Jiang stated "I can't confirm whether this young man you mentioned was arrested or not.".
- One of Richard McGregor's books, "The Party", describes a relationship between the Communist Party and the Chinese government. The Chinese Communist Party,
the country's sole political party governing China, let Chinese people know that they are using the "model of the US government" that "appoints the entire U.S. cabinet and the heads of federal regulatory commissions, the justices of the Supreme Court, state governors and their deputies, the mayors of major cities, the chief executives of GE, Exxon-Mobil,
Wal-Mart and about fifty of the remaining largest U.S. companies, the editors of the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post, the bosses of the TV networks (e.g.; ABC, CBS, and NBC) and cable stations (HBO, ShowTime, and CNN), the presidents of MIT, Yale and Harvard and other big universities, and the heads of think-tanks (eg.; Brookings Institute,
Rand, and the Heritage Foundation)", and the vetting process is secret, and the appointments are announced without any accompanying explanations why they had been made; most Chinese people know these are not true, but no one dares to speak up.
Interestingly, in March 2008 the Chinese Communist Party ordered to "establish a store Communist Party committee" within one Wal-Mart store located in the north-east of China.
- China is made up of 23 provinces, five autonomous regions, four municipalities directly under the Central Government, and the special administrative regions of Hong Kong and Macao. The 23 provinces are Anhui, Fujian, Gansu,
Guangdong, Guizhou, Hainan, Hebei, Heilongjiang, Henan, Hubei, Hunan, Jiangsu, Jiangxi, Jilin, Liaoning, Qinghai, Shaanxi, Shandong, Shanxi, Sichuan, Taiwan, Yunnan, Zhejiang; the five autonomous regions are Guangxi, Inner Mongolia, Ningxia, Xinjiang, and Tibet; the four municipalities are Beijing, Chongqing, Shanghai and Tianjin.
The interesting and fun fact is that Taiwan is not belonging to China, which has consistently claimed sovereignty over Taiwan and asserted Taiwan is no longer in legitimate existence.
- China is a socialist republic ruled by a single party, the Communist Party of China. Power in China is divided between the National People's Congress (NPC), the President, and the State Council. The NPC is the single legislative body, whose members are selected by the Communist Party.
The State Council, headed by the Premier, is the administrative branch. The People's Liberation Army (PLA), which includes the Army, Navy, Air Force, and the Second Artillery Force, also wields considerable political power, the President is chairman of the Central Military Commission of China, the country's top military organ and commander of its armed forces.
The President, the Premier and all government officials are selected by the Communist Party.
- Roughly half (47%) of China’s current population were born under the country’s one-child policy (ages 0 to 34 today), and they lived through a very different China,
the world’s most populous nation, than the half who were born before.
- President Trump defeated Clinton in the Electoral College in the 2016 presidential election,
collecting 304 votes to her 227; however, Clinton won the popular vote by 2,864,974 ballots cast. Trump tells Congressional leaders 3-5-million
"illegals" cost him popular vote.
- One of 11 members of Germany’s parliament (622 members) with Turkish roots; about 3 millions people of Turkish descent live in Germany; half of them retain Turkish citizenship,
making Germany in effect Turkey’s fourth-largest electoral district. Some 2,000 of the country’s 3,000 mosques are Turkish, and 900 of those are financed by DITIB, an arm of the Turkish government, which sends the imams from Turkey.
- Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Turkey's president, tightened his grip on Turkey in July 2016, by shutting down
16 television channels, 23 radio stations, 45 newspapers, 15 universities, 934 other schools, 109 student dormitories, 19 unions, 35 medical institutions as well as over 1,100 other charities and foundations, in his decree since imposing a state of emergency after the failed military coup.
He has suspended, detained or placed under investigation more than 60,000 soldiers, police, judges, teachers, civil servants, journalists and others for “complicity in the attempted coup”. The dismissed
2,400 military personnel included 1,200 commissioned officers from the navy, air and land forces.
- In "Hostile Takeover: The Corporate Empire of Cambodia’s Ruling Family" Prime Minister Hun Sen (who is already one of the world’s longest-serving leaders) and his family
have interests in at least 114 local companies with a combined share capital over $200 million. “The Huns are renowned as one of the
richest, if not the richest, and most powerful families in Cambodia, with a combined wealth estimated by experts to total between $500 million and $1 billion.”
The report was released just a week in July 2016 after the U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee in Washington approved a spending bill that makes foreign aid to Cambodia (one of the world's poorest countries) worth $77.8 million
contingent upon an end to government harassment of opposition politicians.
- Corruption is deeply embedded in Thailand for numerous reasons, including the tradition that officials were entitled to 10 to 30 percent of expenditures
for rendering their services, rather than a salary; a tradition of giving gifts to high officials also persists, and while these practices are not directly corrupting, the continuation of gift-giving during a period when officials receive salaries is a major basis of corruption.
Businesses indicate that irregular payments and bribes are commonly made in order to obtain favorable judicial decisions; almost four out of five Thai believe most or all of the police to be corrupt.
- Malaysia's then-Attorney General Abdul Gani Patail linked a donation of $681m (£478m) made to the account of Mr. Najib Razak, Malaysia's prime minister,
with companies and bodies which had ties to 1MDB. In 7/2015 Mr Najib fired Mr Patail and replaced him with Mr Naji, and also canned the deputy prime minister, Muhyiddin Yassin,
who had criticized his handling of the crisis. Mr Naji cleared Mr Najib of corruption in 1/2016. Mr. Razak said that a Saudi royal family member gave him $681 million!
- Malaysia's prime minister, Najib Razak, who founded and is the chair of 1MDB, was accused of siphoning money from the investment fund after $681 million was transferred into his personal accounts
while $4 billion was misappropriated from 1MDB.
- In April 2016 Thailand’s coup leaders gave military officers broad police-like powers to arrest and detain, further eroding the capabilities of civilian authorities in the junta-run state. The military is authorized to
seize assets, suspend financial transactions, ban suspects from traveling and arrest people involved with against public peace, defamation, gambling, extortion, and labor abuses.
- As of 2012 around 70,000 Christians were imprisoned in North Korea’s concentration camps
- The level of corruption in Cambodia exceeds most countries in the world. Despite adopting an 'Anti-Corruption Law' in 2010, corruption prevails throughout the country. The 2010 Anti-Corruption Law provided no protection to whistle-blowers, and whistle-blowers can be jailed for up to 6 months if they report corruption that cannot be proven.
- Around 200,000 Timorese were killed by Indonesia during the period the country occupied East Timor from December 1975 to October 1999.
- An investigation conducted by United Nations showed that in the first 10 months of 1982, Thai pirates attacked 289
Vietnamese refugee boats - with, on average, more than three attacks per boat; there were 484 known deaths or murders and 583 identified rape victims.
- Thai pirates killed nearly 1,450 refugees and raped more than 2,300 people in the south China Sea in 1980's, and the Thai government did not take any actions.
- An estimated 70 million deaths in China through starvation, forced
labor, and executions when Mao Zedong governed as Chairman of the Communist Party of China from its establishment in 1949 until his death in 1976.
- Around 2 million people, an estimated 25 percent of the total population, were killed in Cambodia during the brutal regime of Pol Pot and the
Khmer Rouge from 1975 to 1979. The genocide was ended following the Vietnamese invasion of Cambodia.
- At least 67% of 2,709,918 Americans military personnel served in uniform in Vietnam were volunteers, and the last American troops departed Vietnam on 29 March 1973.
The fall of South Vietnam happened 30 April 1975, two years after the American military left Vietnam.
- In 1971, during the nine-month-long Bangladesh war for independence, the Pakistani military and its supporting militias killed around 3,000,000
people and raped between 200,000–400,000 Bangladeshi women in a systematic campaign of genocidal rape.
- In 1915, Turkey set in motion a plan to expel and massacre Armenians
living in the Ottoman Empire; by the early 1920s, when the massacres and deportations finally ended, around 1.5 million Armenians, an estimated 75 percent of the total population, were dead;
the Turkish government has denied that a genocide took place.
- Jean-Jacques Dessalines, the first ruler of an independent Haiti, ordered the killing of the white population of French creoles on Haiti which culminated in the 1804 Haiti Massacre
- An estimated 2 million deaths in Vietnam through starvation during the Japanese occupation of Vietnam from October 1944 to May 1945.
|